If you require utmost precision in AR, with highly-advanced, AI-integrated features and object spawning capability, EasyAR is unbeatable. However, for beginners, digitals artists or educators with limited coding knowledge seeking simple AR experience creation and seamless Adobe Suite integration, Adobe Aero is a worthy choice.

EasyAR vs Adobe Aero

Key Differences Between EasyAR and Adobe Aero

  • Coding: EasyAR uses API integrations while Adobe Aero requires no coding or 3D design.
  • Integration: EasyAR has cross-platform support while Adobe Aero integrates well with Adobe Creative Cloud applications.
  • Pricing: EasyAR requires a subscription fee beginning at $39/month, whereas Adobe Aero is part of Adobe’s subscription service.
  • Usability: Both offer a user-friendly experience, but Adobe Aero’s intuitive gesture controls make it easier for beginners.
  • Support: Adobe Aero supports only iOS, whereas EasyAR has robust multi-platform support.
  • Developers: EasyAR provides developer-focused features with its SDK; Adobe Aero leans towards designers.
ComparisonEasyARAdobe Aero
Primary UseAR platform for application development with digital animationsAR creation tool with intuitive gestures for asset placement
Main FeaturesRelocalization, persistent AR content, cloud-based, AR Cloud Image Recognition, motion tracking capabilities, AR Configurator, AR MeasurementInteractive experiences, behavioral content triggers, object motion paths
Release Year20122019
Pricing$39/month with free trialFree with Adobe Creative Cloud subscription
IntegrationAPI accessAdobe Photoshop, Illustrator, other Adobe Creative Cloud applications
ProsCross-platform support, easy integration, accurate AR featuresEasy to use, compatibility with Adobe Creative Cloud suite enhances workflows
ConsUnfeasible pricing, lack of optimization, limited web supportOnly available to iOS devices, lacks advanced features of other AR platforms
Special FeaturesEmploys AR Cloud Image Recognition, target management. High-precision 3D physical world models, auto-spawning and controlsViewer mode for interaction, updates for stability & performance improvements
Latest ReleasesEasyAR Mega, city-scale AR cloud solution with localization abilityAdobe planned future updates include Android device support, 3D scanning, audio, more AR platforms integration

What Is EasyAR and Who’s It For?

EasyAR is an augmented reality (AR) platform hailing from China, designed as an adept tool for application development and digital animations. Launched in 2012, it’s blooming with engaging features such as relocalization, persistent AR content, and both local and cloud-based access. EasyAR is engineered specifically for developers and tech-minded individuals seeking to create an immersive digital experience via AR apps on iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS.

With EasyAR Sense 4.0, users are handed a considerable arsenal of algorithm components, motion tracking capabilities, and platform support. The incorporation of SenseMARS software platform provides perception intelligence, decision intelligence, and AI-empowered AR, MR content generation.

Colorful avatar in Metaverse environment, representing a digital identity as created by EasyAR.

Pros of EasyAR

  • Cross-platform support
  • Easy integration and API access
  • Accurate AR features, including relocalization, AR Measurement, and AR Occlusion
  • No coding needed due to the SenseMARS software platform
  • Revolutionary features like high-precision 3D world models and avatars auto-generated from photos

Cons of EasyAR

  • Unfeasible pricing at $39/month
  • Lack of optimization
  • Limited web support

What Is Adobe Aero and Who’s It For?

Adobe Aero stands tall as an innovative AR creation tool that requires no coding or 3D design skills. It proves to be the knight in shining armor for non-technical creatives who want to leverage AR in their work. Providing seamless integration with various Adobe Creative Cloud applications, Adobe Aero is a doorway to intuitive and engaging real-world AR experiences.

This tool allows users to use intuitive gestures to place, rotate, and scale assets while offering complex and interactive experiences, behavioral content triggers, object motion paths.

Colorful Photoshop image integrating with Adobe Aero's AR interface.

Pros of Adobe Aero

  • Simplifies AR development and enhances workflows
  • Intuitive interface with easy asset manipulation
  • Supports App Clips for faster loading experiences
  • Great compatibility with Adobe Creative Cloud applications

Cons of Adobe Aero

  • Only available to iOS devices
  • Lacks some advanced features of other AR platforms
  • Fails to open certain projects
  • Currently limited to mobile app

Final Verdict: EasyAR vs Adobe Aero

In our tech-ridden universe, each AR platform holds its merit. Yet, only one can reign supreme in any context. Let’s discern:

Developers and Game Makers

In the vast expanse of development and gaming, EasyAR strikes true. Its detailed algorithm components, motion tracking features, and developer-friendly SDK offer an edge. Plus, cross-platform support ensures seamless transition across iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS,Adobe Aero falls short with its limited advanced features.

an engaged programmer typing complex code on a neon-lit gaming keyboard

Tech Consumers

In an era where time’s valued more than money, Adobe Aero’s compatibility with Adobe Creative Cloud absolves users of technicalities, provides simplicity, speed, and interactive experiences, while EasyAR’s pricing may deter.

busy tech consumer swiftly creating AR content on Adobe Aero on tablet

Business Professionals

EasyAR caters well for business and professional users, offering city-scale mapping and a SLAM framework. However, Aero’s simplicity and intuition coupled with Adobe Creative Cloud compatibility makes it an excellent choice for business professionals who want a more streamlined approach.

business professionals discussing AR compatibility on EasyAR and Adobe Aero

Your choice hinges on your context, but EasyAR stands out as a more versatile solution. Offering a range of advanced features, it outperforms Adobe Aero, which, though user-friendly, falls back on advanced options and all-platform compatibility.